https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376963 A denial of Merchandise Exports from India Scheme benefit could not stand where it was based entirely on a later adjudication order that had not been served on the petitioner and had not been put to the petitioner before the speaking order was passed. The absence of an opportunity to meet that later order breached fair hearing requirements. The proper course was to allow the petitioner to respond to the adjudication order and then reconsider the claim on merits. The denial order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh decision after hearing all concerned. en-us Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Aug 2019 11:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376963 A denial of Merchandise Exports from India Scheme benefit could not stand where it was based entirely on a later adjudication order that had not been served on the petitioner and had not been put to the petitioner before the speaking order was passed. The absence of an opportunity to meet that later order breached fair hearing requirements. The proper course was to allow the petitioner to respond to the adjudication order and then reconsider the claim on merits. The denial order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh decision after hearing all concerned. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376963