https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279471 Parliamentary occupation of the field in higher and technical education barred a State law that imposed a parallel single-window admission system and fee-control regime for private professional institutions; the Court held the measure unconstitutional for repugnancy and non-compliance with Article 254. The Court also held that complete State control over admissions and fee fixation extinguished the core autonomy of private unaided educational institutions and was not a reasonable restriction under Article 19(1)(g) or saved by Article 19(6). The enactment was struck down. en-us Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:21:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279471 Parliamentary occupation of the field in higher and technical education barred a State law that imposed a parallel single-window admission system and fee-control regime for private professional institutions; the Court held the measure unconstitutional for repugnancy and non-compliance with Article 254. The Court also held that complete State control over admissions and fee fixation extinguished the core autonomy of private unaided educational institutions and was not a reasonable restriction under Article 19(1)(g) or saved by Article 19(6). The enactment was struck down. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279471