<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 978 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376957</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remand, directing a detailed review to ascertain if the contracts constituted composite works involving both materials and services, in accordance with legal precedents and specific agreement terms. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication to determine the nature of the works contracts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 978 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376957</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remand, directing a detailed review to ascertain if the contracts constituted composite works involving both materials and services, in accordance with legal precedents and specific agreement terms. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication to determine the nature of the works contracts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>