<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 977 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376956</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving refund claims under Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal affirmed that the input service credit was admissible as the services provided qualified as export of services, meeting Rule 6A (d) conditions with the place of provision of services being outside India. Despite the Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal found in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the need for proper documentation support in examining refund claims. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 977 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376956</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving refund claims under Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal affirmed that the input service credit was admissible as the services provided qualified as export of services, meeting Rule 6A (d) conditions with the place of provision of services being outside India. Despite the Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal found in favor of the respondents, emphasizing the need for proper documentation support in examining refund claims. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>