<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 975 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order demanding interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, thereby allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal held that the appellant, acting as RBI&#039;s agent, is not liable to pay Service Tax on government transactions and found the interest demand under Section 75 unsustainable. The decision was based on legal arguments and precedents, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:04:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 975 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order demanding interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, thereby allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal held that the appellant, acting as RBI&#039;s agent, is not liable to pay Service Tax on government transactions and found the interest demand under Section 75 unsustainable. The decision was based on legal arguments and precedents, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>