<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17341</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, denying tax exemption under section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act. The Court held that the firm, engaged in supplying gas cylinders, did not qualify as an industrial undertaking distributing power. Gas was deemed a fuel and not power directly, requiring oxidation for energy generation. The Court concluded that distributing gas cylinders did not constitute distribution of power, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim for tax exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:42:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17341</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee, denying tax exemption under section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act. The Court held that the firm, engaged in supplying gas cylinders, did not qualify as an industrial undertaking distributing power. Gas was deemed a fuel and not power directly, requiring oxidation for energy generation. The Court concluded that distributing gas cylinders did not constitute distribution of power, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim for tax exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>