<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 950 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376929</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of credit on GTA service to determine the place of removal and eligibility based on circular and previous decisions. It allowed credit on works contract service, upheld the disallowance of credit on printing charges, and set aside the penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:03:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 950 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376929</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of credit on GTA service to determine the place of removal and eligibility based on circular and previous decisions. It allowed credit on works contract service, upheld the disallowance of credit on printing charges, and set aside the penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>