<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 948 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal due to the lack of evidence showing unjust enrichment. The decision emphasized the importance of evidence in determining the passing on of duty incidence and highlighted the appellant&#039;s successful demonstration of non-passing of the excess duty burden.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 948 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal due to the lack of evidence showing unjust enrichment. The decision emphasized the importance of evidence in determining the passing on of duty incidence and highlighted the appellant&#039;s successful demonstration of non-passing of the excess duty burden.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>