https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376924 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the time-barred demand for the period January 2012 to July 2012. The tribunal allowed the appeal regarding entitlement to Cenvat credit on supplementary invoices, emphasizing that the penalties imposed on the executives were not sustainable as they were consequential to the demand of duty, which was found to be time-barred. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to statutory timelines and the absence of malafide intentions in cases involving penalties. en-us Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:02:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376924 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the time-barred demand for the period January 2012 to July 2012. The tribunal allowed the appeal regarding entitlement to Cenvat credit on supplementary invoices, emphasizing that the penalties imposed on the executives were not sustainable as they were consequential to the demand of duty, which was found to be time-barred. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to statutory timelines and the absence of malafide intentions in cases involving penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376924