<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 936 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Company&#039;s appeal by holding the denial of Cenvat credit on bought out drums as inadmissible and setting aside the demand on third-party inspection charges. The demand for the removal of drums as samples was upheld, but the penalty on the Director was set aside. The penalty on the appellant under Section 11AC was upheld as the samples cleared were dutiable. The Tribunal fully allowed the Director&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:02:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 936 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Company&#039;s appeal by holding the denial of Cenvat credit on bought out drums as inadmissible and setting aside the demand on third-party inspection charges. The demand for the removal of drums as samples was upheld, but the penalty on the Director was set aside. The penalty on the appellant under Section 11AC was upheld as the samples cleared were dutiable. The Tribunal fully allowed the Director&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>