<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1274 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279456</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court took the parties&#039; consent terms on record and recorded the appellant&#039;s undertaking to abide by them in toto. Exercising its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, the Court brought the dispute to an end and noted that nothing further survived in the appeal. The appeal was accordingly disposed of on the basis of the consent terms and the recorded undertaking.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:15:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1274 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279456</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court took the parties&#039; consent terms on record and recorded the appellant&#039;s undertaking to abide by them in toto. Exercising its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, the Court brought the dispute to an end and noted that nothing further survived in the appeal. The appeal was accordingly disposed of on the basis of the consent terms and the recorded undertaking.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>