<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1275 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279457</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court exercised its constitutional power under Article 142 to accept the settlement reached between the parties, despite noting that the appellate order was otherwise correct. On that basis, the pending proceeding before the National Company Law Tribunal was directed to stand disposed of. The operative effect was that the settlement was given judicial effect and the live proceedings were brought to an end.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:15:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1275 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279457</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court exercised its constitutional power under Article 142 to accept the settlement reached between the parties, despite noting that the appellate order was otherwise correct. On that basis, the pending proceeding before the National Company Law Tribunal was directed to stand disposed of. The operative effect was that the settlement was given judicial effect and the live proceedings were brought to an end.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>