https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17335 The court partly allowed the writ petition by quashing the retrospective withdrawal of approval for scientific research purposes, notices issued by the Faizabad Income-tax Officer, and orders under section 263 of the Income-tax Act. The court dismissed the petition regarding the notice for the assessment year 1983-84, ruling that the Assessing Officer had jurisdiction to issue it. The High Court at Allahabad had jurisdiction to hear the case due to the petitioner's registered office location. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:15:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17335 The court partly allowed the writ petition by quashing the retrospective withdrawal of approval for scientific research purposes, notices issued by the Faizabad Income-tax Officer, and orders under section 263 of the Income-tax Act. The court dismissed the petition regarding the notice for the assessment year 1983-84, ruling that the Assessing Officer had jurisdiction to issue it. The High Court at Allahabad had jurisdiction to hear the case due to the petitioner's registered office location. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 13 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17335