<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 911 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376890</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed by the AO under section 271A for the assessment year 2013-14. The Tribunal found that the penalty was unwarranted as the increase in turnover did not necessitate the maintenance of books under section 44AB. Consequently, the penalty was set aside, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 09:03:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 911 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376890</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the penalty imposed by the AO under section 271A for the assessment year 2013-14. The Tribunal found that the penalty was unwarranted as the increase in turnover did not necessitate the maintenance of books under section 44AB. Consequently, the penalty was set aside, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>