https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376866 The court found that branding petitioner No.1 as a shell company without proper hearing was unjustified and violated natural justice principles. It set aside the branding and allowed the writ petition, emphasizing procedural fairness. The court confirmed petitioner No.2's authority to challenge the branding, highlighting the impact on the company's reputation. SEBI's actions were deemed unjustified without prior notice or hearing, emphasizing the need for natural justice. The court upheld the petitioners' standing to challenge the branding, emphasizing the importance of being heard before adverse findings. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Apr 2019 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376866 The court found that branding petitioner No.1 as a shell company without proper hearing was unjustified and violated natural justice principles. It set aside the branding and allowed the writ petition, emphasizing procedural fairness. The court confirmed petitioner No.2's authority to challenge the branding, highlighting the impact on the company's reputation. SEBI's actions were deemed unjustified without prior notice or hearing, emphasizing the need for natural justice. The court upheld the petitioners' standing to challenge the branding, emphasizing the importance of being heard before adverse findings. Case-Laws SEBI Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376866