https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376865 Jurisdiction over a winding-up appeal remains with the High Court where the statutory transfer regime under Section 434(1)(c) does not cover appeals arising from winding-up orders already passed. The earlier ruling concerning oppression and mismanagement proceedings under the 1956 Act is confined to the issues it decided and cannot be extended to unrelated winding-up appeals. Transfer provisions must be applied according to their text and the class of proceedings expressly covered. The maintainability objection was therefore overruled, and the winding-up appeal remained maintainable before the High Court. en-us Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:50:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376865 Jurisdiction over a winding-up appeal remains with the High Court where the statutory transfer regime under Section 434(1)(c) does not cover appeals arising from winding-up orders already passed. The earlier ruling concerning oppression and mismanagement proceedings under the 1956 Act is confined to the issues it decided and cannot be extended to unrelated winding-up appeals. Transfer provisions must be applied according to their text and the class of proceedings expressly covered. The maintainability objection was therefore overruled, and the winding-up appeal remained maintainable before the High Court. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376865