<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 867 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376846</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the demand of Service tax under the &#039;Real Estate Agent&#039;s Service&#039; category. The dispute arose from administration charges received by a real estate developer for changing names in ownership records, with the Service Tax Department considering them as &#039;Real Estate Agent&#039;s Service&#039;. The Tribunal disagreed, citing previous decisions that such charges for administrative purposes, not linked to sale transactions, should not be taxed as &#039;Real Estate Agent&#039;s Service&#039;. The Appellate Authority&#039;s error in appreciating the contentions led to the Tribunal setting aside the demand and ruling in favor of the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 867 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376846</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the demand of Service tax under the &#039;Real Estate Agent&#039;s Service&#039; category. The dispute arose from administration charges received by a real estate developer for changing names in ownership records, with the Service Tax Department considering them as &#039;Real Estate Agent&#039;s Service&#039;. The Tribunal disagreed, citing previous decisions that such charges for administrative purposes, not linked to sale transactions, should not be taxed as &#039;Real Estate Agent&#039;s Service&#039;. The Appellate Authority&#039;s error in appreciating the contentions led to the Tribunal setting aside the demand and ruling in favor of the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>