<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 862 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376841</link>
    <description>The Special Leave Petition was disposed of with a clarification that the Adjudicating Authority must decide the matter independently on its own merits and in accordance with law, without being influenced by observations in the impugned judgment. The Supreme Court thus left the substantive controversy for fresh consideration by the authority on the existing record and applicable law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 862 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376841</link>
      <description>The Special Leave Petition was disposed of with a clarification that the Adjudicating Authority must decide the matter independently on its own merits and in accordance with law, without being influenced by observations in the impugned judgment. The Supreme Court thus left the substantive controversy for fresh consideration by the authority on the existing record and applicable law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>