<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 860 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376839</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals and answered the substantial questions of law against the Revenue. It upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decisions, emphasizing the broad definition of &quot;input service&quot; and the nexus between the energy generated by windmills and the manufacturing activity. The court highlighted the importance of supporting environmental-friendly measures and the correct interpretation of the rules in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:12:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 860 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376839</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals and answered the substantial questions of law against the Revenue. It upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decisions, emphasizing the broad definition of &quot;input service&quot; and the nexus between the energy generated by windmills and the manufacturing activity. The court highlighted the importance of supporting environmental-friendly measures and the correct interpretation of the rules in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>