<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner&#039;s Rebate Claim u/r 18 Should Have Been Approved; No Authenticity Issue on ARE-1 Forms Raised.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45238</link>
    <description>Rebate claim - Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - in absence of the respondents doubting the veracity of the ARE-1 forms, the adjudicating authority ought to have allowed the claim for rebate as made by the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:12:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:12:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner&#039;s Rebate Claim u/r 18 Should Have Been Approved; No Authenticity Issue on ARE-1 Forms Raised.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45238</link>
      <description>Rebate claim - Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - in absence of the respondents doubting the veracity of the ARE-1 forms, the adjudicating authority ought to have allowed the claim for rebate as made by the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:12:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>