https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376838 The court held that the revisional authority erred in disallowing the rebate claim under the DEEC Scheme. The veracity of the ARE-1 Forms, which were not questioned, should have been sufficient to support the claim. The judgment quashed the revisional authority's order, directing compliance with the appellate authority's decision. The case was disposed of without costs, with provisions for urgent certified copies of the order available to the parties upon request. en-us Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376838 The court held that the revisional authority erred in disallowing the rebate claim under the DEEC Scheme. The veracity of the ARE-1 Forms, which were not questioned, should have been sufficient to support the claim. The judgment quashed the revisional authority's order, directing compliance with the appellate authority's decision. The case was disposed of without costs, with provisions for urgent certified copies of the order available to the parties upon request. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376838