<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 855 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376834</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside parts of the Commissioner&#039;s order and remanded the matter for redetermination of the value of raw materials, applicability of the extended period of limitation, and penalties under Section 11AC and Rule 26. The demand for interest under Section 11AB was sustained. All five appeals were allowed and remanded to the adjudicating authority for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 855 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376834</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside parts of the Commissioner&#039;s order and remanded the matter for redetermination of the value of raw materials, applicability of the extended period of limitation, and penalties under Section 11AC and Rule 26. The demand for interest under Section 11AB was sustained. All five appeals were allowed and remanded to the adjudicating authority for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>