<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 850 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376829</link>
    <description>Clerical and typographical errors in a final order, including incorrect statutory references, wrong clause and section numbers, and erroneous paragraph numbering, may be corrected when they are apparent from the record and do not require reappreciation of the merits. On that basis, the tribunal treated the mistakes as rectifiable errors and allowed correction of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 07:49:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 850 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376829</link>
      <description>Clerical and typographical errors in a final order, including incorrect statutory references, wrong clause and section numbers, and erroneous paragraph numbering, may be corrected when they are apparent from the record and do not require reappreciation of the merits. On that basis, the tribunal treated the mistakes as rectifiable errors and allowed correction of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>