<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1846 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI, III BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279435</link>
    <description>The High Court initially dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for the approval of a scheme of arrangement for amalgamation. However, the National Company Law Tribunal highlighted the necessity of RBI approval for companies engaged in NBFC activities. Due to the lack of RBI approval and failure to provide evidence thereof, the Tribunal dismissed the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 06:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1846 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI, III BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279435</link>
      <description>The High Court initially dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for the approval of a scheme of arrangement for amalgamation. However, the National Company Law Tribunal highlighted the necessity of RBI approval for companies engaged in NBFC activities. Due to the lack of RBI approval and failure to provide evidence thereof, the Tribunal dismissed the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>