<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1578 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279442</link>
    <description>A company was found liable to be wound up where the record showed non-commencement of business, failure to hold statutory meetings, failure to file returns and accounts, and membership falling below the minimum required for a private company after the death of one shareholder-director. Those facts attracted the statutory grounds for winding up under the Companies Act, 1956. The petition also remained maintainable notwithstanding strike-off of the company&#039;s name from the register under the Companies Act, 2013, because the statutory framework did not bar winding-up proceedings on that basis. The company was therefore ordered to be wound up and an Official Liquidator appointed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 06:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1578 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279442</link>
      <description>A company was found liable to be wound up where the record showed non-commencement of business, failure to hold statutory meetings, failure to file returns and accounts, and membership falling below the minimum required for a private company after the death of one shareholder-director. Those facts attracted the statutory grounds for winding up under the Companies Act, 1956. The petition also remained maintainable notwithstanding strike-off of the company&#039;s name from the register under the Companies Act, 2013, because the statutory framework did not bar winding-up proceedings on that basis. The company was therefore ordered to be wound up and an Official Liquidator appointed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>