<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1622 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI BENCH-III</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279446</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the petition under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 due to the pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding project completion issues. The complexity of the dispute required examination beyond insolvency proceedings, leading the tribunal to emphasize the need for alternative forums for resolution. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 06:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1622 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI BENCH-III</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279446</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the petition under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 due to the pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding project completion issues. The complexity of the dispute required examination beyond insolvency proceedings, leading the tribunal to emphasize the need for alternative forums for resolution. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>