<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1202 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279427</link>
    <description>Interference with an acquittal is impermissible where the trial court has taken a possible view of the evidence, especially in light of the presumption of innocence strengthened by acquittal; the trial court&#039;s doubts about witness credibility and documentary inconsistencies were therefore respected and the acquittal restored. Criminal conspiracy was not proved because the evidence did not establish a prior meeting of minds or antecedent agreement, and mere presence at the scene did not suffice. The convictions for murder and allied offences were unsafe because of material inconsistencies, omissions and improvements in the eyewitness and police evidence, doubts over the dying declaration, and a plausible plea of alibi for two accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1202 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279427</link>
      <description>Interference with an acquittal is impermissible where the trial court has taken a possible view of the evidence, especially in light of the presumption of innocence strengthened by acquittal; the trial court&#039;s doubts about witness credibility and documentary inconsistencies were therefore respected and the acquittal restored. Criminal conspiracy was not proved because the evidence did not establish a prior meeting of minds or antecedent agreement, and mere presence at the scene did not suffice. The convictions for murder and allied offences were unsafe because of material inconsistencies, omissions and improvements in the eyewitness and police evidence, doubts over the dying declaration, and a plausible plea of alibi for two accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>