<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 837 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376816</link>
    <description>The case involved the applicability of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 to contractors/sub-contractors working on the construction of the Indo-Nepal Border Road. The primary issue was whether the exemption under the said notification extended to sub-contractors. One view held that sub-contractors were liable to pay GST at 12%, while another view argued that the exemption for the main contractor should logically extend to sub-contractors to maintain the benefit throughout the supply chain. Due to conflicting views, the matter was referred to the Appellate Authority for a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 837 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, UTTARAKHAND</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376816</link>
      <description>The case involved the applicability of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 to contractors/sub-contractors working on the construction of the Indo-Nepal Border Road. The primary issue was whether the exemption under the said notification extended to sub-contractors. One view held that sub-contractors were liable to pay GST at 12%, while another view argued that the exemption for the main contractor should logically extend to sub-contractors to maintain the benefit throughout the supply chain. Due to conflicting views, the matter was referred to the Appellate Authority for a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>