https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376808 The Tribunal concluded that the mistake in its final order, influenced by incorrect admissions from both parties, warranted rectification. It recalled the order dated 11 August 2017 and scheduled the appeals for a fresh hearing to address the jurisdictional issue and other merits comprehensively. The decision underscores the Tribunal's commitment to ensuring justice by rectifying errors apparent from the record, consistent with the principles established by higher judicial authorities. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Mar 2020 12:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376808 The Tribunal concluded that the mistake in its final order, influenced by incorrect admissions from both parties, warranted rectification. It recalled the order dated 11 August 2017 and scheduled the appeals for a fresh hearing to address the jurisdictional issue and other merits comprehensively. The decision underscores the Tribunal's commitment to ensuring justice by rectifying errors apparent from the record, consistent with the principles established by higher judicial authorities. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376808