https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376804 The Debtors' Court found Mr. Kejriwal in violation of statutory requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. He failed to comply with his duties as Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and Resolution Professional (RP), did not manage the corporate debtors (CDs) as going concerns, and resigned without Adjudicating Authority (AA) permission. Despite citing illness and initial non-going concern status of the CDs, he was penalized with a monetary fine equivalent to his fees in both cases. Mr. Kejriwal was also mandated to undertake an educational course before taking on any future Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code assignments. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Mar 2019 08:25:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376804 The Debtors' Court found Mr. Kejriwal in violation of statutory requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. He failed to comply with his duties as Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and Resolution Professional (RP), did not manage the corporate debtors (CDs) as going concerns, and resigned without Adjudicating Authority (AA) permission. Despite citing illness and initial non-going concern status of the CDs, he was penalized with a monetary fine equivalent to his fees in both cases. Mr. Kejriwal was also mandated to undertake an educational course before taking on any future Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code assignments. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376804