<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 820 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376799</link>
    <description>The tribunal confirmed the liability of the appellant to pay service tax on terminal charges received from Indian Railways under &quot;port services&quot; but set aside the demand for the extended period. The liability for service tax on royalty charges under &quot;franchise services&quot; was dismissed. The issue of service tax on demurrage charges was remitted for further investigation. Penalties under Sec. 76, 77, and 78 were waived due to the appellant&#039;s cooperation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 820 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376799</link>
      <description>The tribunal confirmed the liability of the appellant to pay service tax on terminal charges received from Indian Railways under &quot;port services&quot; but set aside the demand for the extended period. The liability for service tax on royalty charges under &quot;franchise services&quot; was dismissed. The issue of service tax on demurrage charges was remitted for further investigation. Penalties under Sec. 76, 77, and 78 were waived due to the appellant&#039;s cooperation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>