<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 815 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on pilotage charges under &#039;Port Services&#039;, directed re-computation of the tax and penalties, confirmed the jurisdiction of the adjudicating authority, and justified the use of the extended period of limitation. The appeals were disposed of with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 815 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on pilotage charges under &#039;Port Services&#039;, directed re-computation of the tax and penalties, confirmed the jurisdiction of the adjudicating authority, and justified the use of the extended period of limitation. The appeals were disposed of with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>