<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 810 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty proceedings initiated under Section 271AAB for AY 2012-13 and deleted the penalty of Rs. 86,85,000. The Tribunal highlighted that invoking Section 271(1)(c) would have been more appropriate. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty proceedings under Section 271AAB were deemed invalid and bad in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2019 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 810 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty proceedings initiated under Section 271AAB for AY 2012-13 and deleted the penalty of Rs. 86,85,000. The Tribunal highlighted that invoking Section 271(1)(c) would have been more appropriate. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty proceedings under Section 271AAB were deemed invalid and bad in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>