<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer Misclassifies Obsolete Stores as Capital Expenditure, Disallowing Section 42 Deductions for Taxpayer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45197</link>
    <description>Disallowance of obsolete store and spares - AO, treat the same as capital expenditure and did not constitute stock-in-trade and deduction u/s 42 could be allowed to the assessee for capital expenditure as and when the same are certified by the Auditors - it can&#039;t be treated as capital expenditure for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2019 08:23:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2019 07:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer Misclassifies Obsolete Stores as Capital Expenditure, Disallowing Section 42 Deductions for Taxpayer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45197</link>
      <description>Disallowance of obsolete store and spares - AO, treat the same as capital expenditure and did not constitute stock-in-trade and deduction u/s 42 could be allowed to the assessee for capital expenditure as and when the same are certified by the Auditors - it can&#039;t be treated as capital expenditure for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2019 08:23:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>