https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376767 The appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside due to the vague and unclear nature of the show cause notices and the basis for demanding the differential duty. The Tribunal found gaps in the invoices, inconsistencies in the duty calculations, and a lack of clarity in determining the extent of undervaluation. The rejection of transaction values with related parties was deemed permissible under the Central Excise Act, but the demands lacked specificity and transparency, leading to the order being overturned. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Mar 2019 08:21:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376767 The appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside due to the vague and unclear nature of the show cause notices and the basis for demanding the differential duty. The Tribunal found gaps in the invoices, inconsistencies in the duty calculations, and a lack of clarity in determining the extent of undervaluation. The rejection of transaction values with related parties was deemed permissible under the Central Excise Act, but the demands lacked specificity and transparency, leading to the order being overturned. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376767