<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 43 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17303</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the assessment of the understatement in closing stock in favor of the Revenue, while ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the legality of the levy of interest under section 139(8) and section 215 of the Income-tax Act. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues raised and the reasoning behind the court&#039;s decisions, ensuring a comprehensive review of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 43 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17303</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the assessment of the understatement in closing stock in favor of the Revenue, while ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the legality of the levy of interest under section 139(8) and section 215 of the Income-tax Act. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues raised and the reasoning behind the court&#039;s decisions, ensuring a comprehensive review of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>