<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 770 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376749</link>
    <description>Reassessment orders under the Value Added Tax Act were held unsustainable where they did not disclose the assessee&#039;s objections, the manner of their consideration, or reasons for rejecting them. An assessment order must show application of mind and give reasons for adjustments and additions, particularly when objections are raised. The absence of a meaningful hearing and of speaking reasons meant the orders could not stand, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered after due opportunity to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2019 07:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=563010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 770 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376749</link>
      <description>Reassessment orders under the Value Added Tax Act were held unsustainable where they did not disclose the assessee&#039;s objections, the manner of their consideration, or reasons for rejecting them. An assessment order must show application of mind and give reasons for adjustments and additions, particularly when objections are raised. The absence of a meaningful hearing and of speaking reasons meant the orders could not stand, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered after due opportunity to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>