<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 444 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279400</link>
    <description>A previously dismissed special leave petition made the recount challenge final between the parties, so it could not be reopened in the appeal. On the election dispute, the recount and inspection did not prove the alleged counting irregularities, and post-declaration defects in the custody or sealing of election material were held insufficient to invalidate the result without proof of material effect or a statutory ground for avoidance. The pleadings also did not justify a partial repoll. The Court found the allegations against the High Court intemperate and scandalous, but accepted the appellant&#039;s unqualified apology as genuine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:06:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 444 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279400</link>
      <description>A previously dismissed special leave petition made the recount challenge final between the parties, so it could not be reopened in the appeal. On the election dispute, the recount and inspection did not prove the alleged counting irregularities, and post-declaration defects in the custody or sealing of election material were held insufficient to invalidate the result without proof of material effect or a statutory ground for avoidance. The pleadings also did not justify a partial repoll. The Court found the allegations against the High Court intemperate and scandalous, but accepted the appellant&#039;s unqualified apology as genuine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>