<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 721 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279390</link>
    <description>In a central excise appeal, the SC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s challenge in the same terms as the assessee&#039;s own earlier case, relying on its prior decision in Crane Betel Nut Powder Works. The order contains no fresh substantive reasoning and simply follows the earlier ruling for the same assessee on the connected excise issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:45:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 721 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279390</link>
      <description>In a central excise appeal, the SC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s challenge in the same terms as the assessee&#039;s own earlier case, relying on its prior decision in Crane Betel Nut Powder Works. The order contains no fresh substantive reasoning and simply follows the earlier ruling for the same assessee on the connected excise issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>