<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 764 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376743</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order with consequential relief granted to the appellant. The Appellate Authority found the confirmation of demand, confiscation of goods, and imposition of penalties unjustified due to lack of substantial evidence supporting the intention to evade duty and the appellant&#039;s eligibility for the small scale exemption Notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:56:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 764 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376743</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order with consequential relief granted to the appellant. The Appellate Authority found the confirmation of demand, confiscation of goods, and imposition of penalties unjustified due to lack of substantial evidence supporting the intention to evade duty and the appellant&#039;s eligibility for the small scale exemption Notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>