https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376740 The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the denial of credit on inputs was unjustified in all instances. The appellant successfully argued against denial based on various grounds such as non-transportation of goods, unavailability of vehicle owners, reported non-transport vehicles, destroyed records, lack of verification, premises vacation by suppliers, and a supplier's statement. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief, affirming the appellant's right to the cenvat credit on the invoices in question. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:56:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376740 The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the denial of credit on inputs was unjustified in all instances. The appellant successfully argued against denial based on various grounds such as non-transportation of goods, unavailability of vehicle owners, reported non-transport vehicles, destroyed records, lack of verification, premises vacation by suppliers, and a supplier's statement. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief, affirming the appellant's right to the cenvat credit on the invoices in question. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376740