<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 751 - THE NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376730</link>
    <description>The Respondent was found not guilty of profiteering under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, as they had passed on the benefit of a GST rate reduction to consumers by adjusting the selling price of the product in question. The Authority confirmed that there was no contravention and dismissed the application, directing both parties to receive a copy of the order and closing the case file.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 751 - THE NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376730</link>
      <description>The Respondent was found not guilty of profiteering under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, as they had passed on the benefit of a GST rate reduction to consumers by adjusting the selling price of the product in question. The Authority confirmed that there was no contravention and dismissed the application, directing both parties to receive a copy of the order and closing the case file.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>