<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 749 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376728</link>
    <description>The special leave petition was dismissed on account of low tax effect, reflecting the Supreme Court&#039;s practice of not entertaining matters where the tax impact does not justify further litigation. Delay in filing was condoned, but the dismissal ultimately rested on the low-tax-effect ground. Pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:29:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 749 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376728</link>
      <description>The special leave petition was dismissed on account of low tax effect, reflecting the Supreme Court&#039;s practice of not entertaining matters where the tax impact does not justify further litigation. Delay in filing was condoned, but the dismissal ultimately rested on the low-tax-effect ground. Pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>