<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 740 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376719</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that interest on non-performing assets (NPA) should not be taxed on an accrual basis when following RBI guidelines. The court emphasized that income must be taxed once accrued, and interest on NPAs with low recovery possibilities cannot be considered accrued income. The order disallowing the deduction for uncharged interest on NPA was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s claim was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 740 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376719</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that interest on non-performing assets (NPA) should not be taxed on an accrual basis when following RBI guidelines. The court emphasized that income must be taxed once accrued, and interest on NPAs with low recovery possibilities cannot be considered accrued income. The order disallowing the deduction for uncharged interest on NPA was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s claim was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>