<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 736 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376715</link>
    <description>The ITAT confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of payment made to employees under VSS for Assessment Year 2007-08. The ITAT found the issue debatable with conflicting interpretations by different authorities, leading to the penalty not being sustainable due to lack of clarity in the penalty order. The appeal of the assessing officer was dismissed, upholding the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2019 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 736 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376715</link>
      <description>The ITAT confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of payment made to employees under VSS for Assessment Year 2007-08. The ITAT found the issue debatable with conflicting interpretations by different authorities, leading to the penalty not being sustainable due to lack of clarity in the penalty order. The appeal of the assessing officer was dismissed, upholding the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>