<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 90 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17288</link>
    <description>Section 65(3) of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955 allows composition based on aggregated land holdings as an alternative to regular assessment. The Madras HC noted that, for registered firms and unregistered firms treated as registered, tax liability under the pre-amendment scheme rested on partners in respect of their total agricultural income, including firm shares. It held that the provision requires inclusion of a partner&#039;s individual holdings and share in the firm&#039;s holdings where both exist, but does not add a separate condition that the partner must independently own land before applying for composition. An unstated precondition cannot be read into the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 90 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17288</link>
      <description>Section 65(3) of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1955 allows composition based on aggregated land holdings as an alternative to regular assessment. The Madras HC noted that, for registered firms and unregistered firms treated as registered, tax liability under the pre-amendment scheme rested on partners in respect of their total agricultural income, including firm shares. It held that the provision requires inclusion of a partner&#039;s individual holdings and share in the firm&#039;s holdings where both exist, but does not add a separate condition that the partner must independently own land before applying for composition. An unstated precondition cannot be read into the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>