<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 714 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376693</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the conversion of the Free Shipping Bill to a Drawback Shipping Bill, granting the appellant consequential benefits. The rejection of the conversion request was deemed unjustified as the necessary declarations for re-export were present on the shipping bill, and the bond was still active. The Tribunal also directed a re-processing of the draw back claim, emphasizing the importance of compliance with statutory provisions under the Customs Act for availing benefits in import-export transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 714 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376693</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the conversion of the Free Shipping Bill to a Drawback Shipping Bill, granting the appellant consequential benefits. The rejection of the conversion request was deemed unjustified as the necessary declarations for re-export were present on the shipping bill, and the bond was still active. The Tribunal also directed a re-processing of the draw back claim, emphasizing the importance of compliance with statutory provisions under the Customs Act for availing benefits in import-export transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=376693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>