<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1220 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279375</link>
    <description>Disallowance under section 14A must have a direct or proximate nexus with exempt income and cannot be applied to produce an amount exceeding the administrative expenditure actually relatable to that income. Where the assessee had already made a reasonable suo motu disallowance and no specific higher expenditure with the required nexus was shown, Rule 8D(2)(iii) could not justify a further addition. The Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 07:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1220 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279375</link>
      <description>Disallowance under section 14A must have a direct or proximate nexus with exempt income and cannot be applied to produce an amount exceeding the administrative expenditure actually relatable to that income. Where the assessee had already made a reasonable suo motu disallowance and no specific higher expenditure with the required nexus was shown, Rule 8D(2)(iii) could not justify a further addition. The Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>