<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1668 - TELANGANA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279383</link>
    <description>Customs detention of imported used multifunction printers and photocopiers could not be sustained where the later consignments were inconsistent with the earlier adjudication and the governing policy materials did not clearly support continued withholding; release had to be considered after the importer furnished the required documents under the applicable regime. Compulsory registration under the Electronics and IT Goods (Requirement for Compulsory Registration) Order, 2012 could not be imposed unless a specific notification covered the goods, and no such notification was shown for these MFD machines. The petition was allowed to that extent, with direction to consider release of the consignments in accordance with law and the earlier adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1668 - TELANGANA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279383</link>
      <description>Customs detention of imported used multifunction printers and photocopiers could not be sustained where the later consignments were inconsistent with the earlier adjudication and the governing policy materials did not clearly support continued withholding; release had to be considered after the importer furnished the required documents under the applicable regime. Compulsory registration under the Electronics and IT Goods (Requirement for Compulsory Registration) Order, 2012 could not be imposed unless a specific notification covered the goods, and no such notification was shown for these MFD machines. The petition was allowed to that extent, with direction to consider release of the consignments in accordance with law and the earlier adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>