<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1782 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279388</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the reassessment notice for AY 2010-11 under Sections 147/148. The Court emphasized the necessity of tangible fresh material outside the record for reassessment and concluded that the Revenue&#039;s failure to tax disclosed amounts earlier did not justify the reassessment. As a result, the writ petition challenging the reassessment notice was allowed, and all related proceedings were annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 07:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=562839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1782 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279388</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the reassessment notice for AY 2010-11 under Sections 147/148. The Court emphasized the necessity of tangible fresh material outside the record for reassessment and concluded that the Revenue&#039;s failure to tax disclosed amounts earlier did not justify the reassessment. As a result, the writ petition challenging the reassessment notice was allowed, and all related proceedings were annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>